In today’s digital economy, electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) is no longer a futuristic concept—it is a business necessity. Governments are enforcing it, enterprises are streamlining operations with it, and finance departments around the world are turning to automation to reduce human error, ensure compliance, and improve efficiency. But with a growing number of providers in the market, choosing the right electronic invoicing tool can be challenging. Among the most prominent solutions are Edicom, Seres, B2Brouter, and Easyap. Each offers a different approach, and the right choice often depends on the specific needs of your business.
This article presents a thorough comparison of the main tools for electronic invoicing, helping you determine which platform suits your organization best. We will examine usability, compliance features, pricing, scalability, and integration capabilities.
What’s the Importance of E-Invoicing Tools?
Electronic invoicing tools simplify the process of sending, receiving, and managing invoices in digital format. They ensure compliance with tax regulations, improve transparency, and reduce manual workloads. The right platform will adapt to your company’s workflows and regional tax regulations, offering seamless integration with existing ERP systems.
The Main Competitors in the Market
Let’s take a closer look at four of the most recognized electronic invoicing tools:
- Easyap
- Edicom
- Seres
- B2Brouter
We’ll compare their features using multiple lenses to better understand their strengths and limitations.
General Overview
| Feature |
Easyap |
Edicom |
Seres |
B2Brouter |
| Founded |
2001 |
1995 |
1984 |
2012 |
| Market Focus |
SMEs & Corporations |
Large enterprises |
Government & Enterprise |
SMEs |
| Interface Language |
Multilingual |
Multilingual |
Multilingual |
English, Spanish, Catalan |
| Cloud-based |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
At first glance, all platforms offer a modern cloud-based infrastructure. However, Easyap stands out by catering to both SMEs and larger organizations without compromising functionality, making it highly adaptable.
Usability and Interface
| Criteria |
Easyap |
Edicom |
Seres |
B2Brouter |
| User Interface |
Intuitive, minimalist |
Complex but powerful |
Moderate learning curve |
Very simple UI |
| Training Needed |
Low |
High |
Moderate |
Low |
| Mobile Access |
Yes |
Yes |
Limited |
Yes |
Easyap offers a minimalist yet powerful user experience with an intuitive layout, reducing the learning curve significantly. Edicom, on the other hand, tends to be more complex, often requiring intensive training. B2Brouter provides a simplified interface, but that also translates into limited functionality.
Compliance and International Regulations
| Compliance Feature |
Easyap |
Edicom |
Seres |
B2Brouter |
| EU Compliance |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
| America |
✓ |
✓ |
✗ |
✗ |
| Peppol Integration |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
| Real-Time Reporting |
✓ |
✓ |
✗ |
✗ |
If your organization operates across borders, compliance becomes critical. Easyap excels with wide international support, especially in Latin America—a region where electronic invoicing mandates are strict and constantly evolving. Unlike Seres or B2Brouter, Easyap and Edicom cover these regions comprehensively. Easyap also supports real-time reporting, essential in countries like Spain, Hungary, and Mexico.
Integration with ERP Systems
| ERP Compatibility |
Easyap |
Edicom |
Seres |
B2Brouter |
| SAP |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✗ |
| Microsoft Dynamics |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✗ |
| Oracle |
✓ |
✓ |
✗ |
✗ |
| Custom API |
✓ |
✓ |
Limited |
Basic |
Easyap offers robust integration with major ERP systems like SAP, Oracle, and Microsoft Dynamics, along with flexible APIs for custom environments. This level of interoperability ensures smooth adaptation to existing company infrastructures without requiring major IT overhauls. B2Brouter, in contrast, lacks ERP compatibility beyond basic exports.
Automation and Workflow Features
| Feature |
Easyap |
Edicom |
Seres |
B2Brouter |
| Automatic Invoice Validation |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✗ |
| Workflow Customization |
✓ |
✓ |
Limited |
✗ |
| Duplicate Detection |
✓ |
✗ |
✓ |
✗ |
| Notification System |
✓ |
✓ |
✗ |
✓ |
Easyap includes smart automation features such as automatic validation, duplicate detection, and customizable workflows. These help minimize manual interventions, reduce error rates, and maintain high data accuracy. B2Brouter’s lack of such features might be acceptable for freelancers or small businesses, but becomes a limitation as your company grows.
Pricing Structure
| Model |
Easyap |
Edicom |
Seres |
B2Brouter |
| Free Plan Available |
No |
No |
No |
Yes (limited) |
| Pay-per-use |
✓ |
✗ |
✗ |
✓ |
| Subscription-based |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
| Custom Packages |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✗ |
Easyap’s hybrid pricing model—combining pay-per-use and subscription—offers flexibility. You only pay for what you use, while still benefiting from enterprise-grade capabilities. B2Brouter’s free plan may appear attractive at first, but it quickly becomes insufficient for any mid-sized operation. Edicom and Seres, meanwhile, often lock users into expensive long-term contracts with features many won’t use.
Customer Support and Onboarding
| Service Feature |
Easyap |
Edicom |
Seres |
B2Brouter |
| Onboarding Support |
Personal onboarding |
Generic documentation |
Mixed |
None |
| Support Language |
Spanish, English, French |
English, Spanish, German |
Spanish, French |
Spanish, English |
| Response Time |
< 24 hours |
48–72 hours |
48 hours |
Variable |
| SLA Availability |
✓ |
✓ |
✗ |
✗ |
Easyap stands out with highly responsive customer service and dedicated onboarding for each client. This is crucial, especially for companies that need to migrate from legacy systems and ensure compliance during the transition. Edicom, while solid, often experiences slower response times.
Why Easyap Is the Smart Choice
Despite the presence of big players like Edicom and specialized platforms like Seres or B2Brouter, Easyap offers a more well-rounded solution. Its combination of adaptability, advanced automation, global compliance, ERP integration, and customer-centric service makes it especially valuable for companies looking to scale or expand internationally.
Whether you’re a mid-sized company managing hundreds of monthly invoices or a large corporation operating in multiple regions, Easyap is built to handle complexity without overwhelming the user. It balances power with usability—a rare combination in the e invoice space.
Final Thoughts
Choosing the right electronic invoicing platform is more than a technical decision—it’s a strategic one. You need a tool that grows with your business, adapts to regulatory changes, and integrates with your current financial ecosystem.
While Edicom may offer scale, it often comes at the price of complexity. Seres is strong in compliance but lacks flexibility. B2Brouter is fine for simple needs but fails to deliver for medium and large enterprises. Easyap, however, brings the best of all worlds: compliance, automation, affordability, and adaptability.
Before making a decision, consider your internal workflows, regional tax requirements, volume of transactions, and technical capacity. And if your priority is performance without sacrificing simplicity, Easyap is undoubtedly a front-runner.
